Part Four of a Series Analyzing Public Statements Made by Berkeley Heights Town Council and BOE Candidates
In this ‘candidate answer’ series, the focus is on the answers to week 3 questions asked of Town Council candidates by TapInto. The question for week three noted the significant amount of change happening in Berkeley Heights and asked candidates what their vision is for the next five years.
In answer to the week three question, Glenn Endick mentioned challenges created through overdevelopment, listing flooding, strain on aging infrastructure, crowded schools and strain on emergency services as issues. He says there is a sense of overcrowding in town and says the answer is to acknowledge challenges and commit to “real solutions”. He says he will “ensure that our police, fire, and teaching staff are expanded to meet growing demands on community”. He says we need to stop overdevelopment, and while this is not so easily accomplished, it’s nice to see someone come in with that perspective, rather than shrug because “we can’t stop it”. While that may be true, the people who do the impossible are those who challenge the impossible. Endick lists fiscal responsibility and exploring alternate ways to generate revenue, other than raising taxes. He also says we need to “recognize our residents are a tremendous resource”.
Michael Kaminsky envisions a town that continues to be “welcoming” and “family-oriented”. He notes the small-town feel Berkeley Heights had when he moved here and says his “goal is to preserve that character while navigating the challenges of mandated development and growth”. He mentions Mount Carmel/Union County park development, Connell, and Nokia as having an impact on that growth. He says he “strongly disagree[s] with one-size-fits-all directives that fail to consider [the] unique character and capacity of small towns like ours”. He tells us our goal should be to meet the letter of the law, not to open the door to unnecessary or excessive growth, and says development should be scaled and designed to maintain charm.
Alvaro Medeiros notes the 2022 Master Plan that received accolades from New Jersey planning officials that he had a role in creating. He mentions the revitalization of Sherman Avenue and improvements to Peppertown Park. Medeiros says this “improvement to the appeal of the downtown” comes at a critical time, and mentions that Connell is far from our downtown. He says we need to “balance future centers”. He mentions his time on the Grants Committee and Environmental Commission, reminding us of a grant he helped secure that led to the planting of 500 trees and contributed to work on Sherman Avenue. He says he is optimistic that recent changes to Berkeley Heights “will be addressed with confidence and deliberation as long as this administration remains in place” and if he and Susan Poage are given a chance to be part of it.
Susan Poage says Berkeley Heights has moved from being a small town to a “thriving suburban bedroom community”. She tells us affordable housing is out of our control, but that it has been kept mostly downtown and at Connell. She notes that with the sale of the Nokia property it will be important to work with developers to have a voice, and points to visioning sessions held by the township for resident input. At the same time, she notes we “can’t get away with no housing”. She also mentions the Master Plan and tells us Mayor Devanney has a positive working relationship with the County and State. On the subject of infrastructure, she says aging is a concern with development adding to the problem. According to Poage, New Jersey developers are legally required to update infrastructure and that there are municipal and state regulations that have a system of developer agreements so that it’s not just residents responsible for costs. She tells us she would work with the school district’s new superintendent “so decisions about schools are not made in silos”. Her vision is to follow the Master Plan.
Two quick thoughts here on statements from Medeiros and Poage. While it’s not my intent to take away from the work they have done, suggesting that the town’s issues won’t be addressed properly unless they are elected strikes me the wrong way. Also, I was deeply saddened by the Peppertown Park “improvements” of tree removal. Lastly, not having time to delve into municipal and state regulations, just let me say I’m highly skeptical that “developer agreements” are sufficient when it comes to updating infrastructure. If they were, we would have a big leg-up on fixing flooding problems and updating the wastewater treatment plant without having to resort to a sale.
- Glenn Endick – Warns of overdevelopment and its strain on schools, infrastructure, and emergency services. Calls for fiscal responsibility and realistic plans to meet growth pressures.
- Michael Kaminsky – Seeks to preserve the town’s small-town character while meeting mandated growth. Opposes one-size-fits-all state directives and favors scaled, community-minded development.
- Alvaro Medeiros – Highlights the 2022 Master Plan, downtown revitalization, and tree-planting grants. Credits his committees for securing funding and shaping the town’s planning efforts.
- Susan Poage – Notes the shift from small town to “thriving suburban community.” Supports working with developers and the BOE while following the Master Plan and leveraging county-state partnerships.
The Poage–Medeiros camp suggests that continued progress depends on their re-election, which strikes the wrong tone for voters who value accountability over incumbency. Their assurances that “developer agreements” are sufficient to update infrastructure also deserve scrutiny, given ongoing flooding and wastewater issues that remain unresolved despite years of such arrangements. The Peppertown Park tree removals further call into question whether all “improvements” have served residents as intended.
Also Read:
Beyond the Talking Points: Analyzing BOE Candidate Responses on Shared Services and Governance
Beyond the Talking Points: Oversight Questions Remain In Berkeley Heights Town Council Responses
Invest in Independent Local Journalism
NJ21st is powered by facts, not special interests. If our reporting helped you stay informed, please consider making a contribution. Every donation strengthens accountability, transparency, and the future of local news in New Jersey.
Contribute Today
