This page is designed to help residents walk into budget meetings with a grounded, apples-to-apples view of how Madison compares with the six other districts on our ACFR dashboard. The rankings below are based on verified 2025 per-pupil figures unless otherwise noted. A rank of 1st means the highest per-student spending in that category among the peer group.
Madison sits in the upper half of the peer group on overall cost per pupil, but its pattern is less about being highest everywhere and more about a mix of middle-tier spending with several sharp spikes in selected categories. That is why residents should look past the top-line number and ask what is actually driving it.
This section looks at general classroom instruction and related instructional support lines. Madison’s picture here is uneven rather than uniformly high.
Madison is not near the top in regular programs, staff training, or textbooks, but it does rank 1st of 7 in improvement of instruction. That is not something to celebrate on its own. It is a line residents should examine closely, especially if the district is not clearly pulling away from peers on outcomes.
Madison shows several upper-tier special education rankings, especially in child study teams, other support, autism, and learning/language disabilities. That may reflect real need, but it also makes these lines worth pressing on.
Madison ranks 1st in child study teams and other support (extra services), while also landing 2nd in autism and learning/language disabilities. Total special education is still only 3rd overall, which suggests the district’s cost profile may be concentrated in specific service buckets rather than being the highest across the board.
These categories shape student life outside the core classroom, including athletics, counseling, health services, library/media, bilingual support, and remedial programs. They still reflect district priorities, not free passes.
Madison is not at the top of the peer group in most student-support lines, but it does rank 2nd of 7 in both bilingual education and cocurricular activities, and 3rd of 7 in educational media services. Those are not automatic problems, but they are still spending choices that should be read in light of district need, outcomes, and what is happening in more core academic lines.
This section separates different kinds of overhead and administrative support. Madison’s administrative profile is mixed, with several very high line items but a lower total administration rank overall.
Madison ranks 1st in legal fees and gen admin (misc), and 2nd in both school administration and the general administration total sub-account. Those are not categories to admire by default. But it also ranks 7th of 7 in employee benefits and only 5th of 7 in total administration, which means this is not a simple “overhead is high everywhere” story. It is a category-composition story.
These are the operating costs of running the district: transportation, safety, facility maintenance, custodial services, and grounds. High rankings here are costs to explain, not accomplishments.
Madison’s operations profile is most elevated in grounds, transportation, and facility maintenance. Grounds ranks 1st of 7, while transportation and facility maintenance both rank 2nd of 7. Those are not flattering facts on their own. They are cost signals that deserve explanation.
These visualizations show not just where Madison ranks in 2025, but where spending has been moving over time relative to the seven-district average. Higher spending is not a point of pride by itself.

Madison ranks 3rd of 7 overall and remains above several peers on total per-pupil cost.

Total instruction ranks 4th of 7, which makes Madison’s sharper spikes elsewhere more important to examine.

Madison ranks 5th of 7 in regular classroom instruction.

Staff training is Madison’s lowest-ranked instructional category at 7th of 7.

Textbook spending lands 4th of 7 in 2025.

Madison ranks 1st of 7 in this instructional support line, which makes it a category residents should press on rather than wave through.

Madison ranks 3rd of 7 in total special education spending.

Resource room spending places Madison 4th of 7.

Out-of-district placement lands 4th of 7 and is not Madison’s clearest special education spike.

Madison ranks 1st of 7 in child study teams, making this one of the district’s clearest cost outliers.

Autism services rank 2nd of 7 in 2025.

Speech-related services rank 3rd of 7.

Madison ranks 2nd of 7 in this category.

This category places Madison 1st of 7 and deserves a concrete explanation from the district.

Madison ranks 2nd of 7 in cocurricular spending, which should be treated as a priority choice, not a built-in positive.

Athletics lands 4th of 7 among peers.

Guidance spending ranks 5th of 7.

Madison ranks 4th of 7 in health services.

Library and media spending ranks 3rd of 7.

This is a lower-ranked category for Madison at 5th of 7.

Madison ranks 2nd of 7 in bilingual education, which should be read in light of student need and structure.

Madison ranks 1st of 7 in this line item, making it one of the clearest overhead categories residents should question.

School administration ranks 2nd of 7.

Central services is one of Madison’s lower-ranked admin categories at 6th of 7.

Administrative information technology ranks 5th of 7.

Madison ranks 1st of 7 in legal fees, a category that should be explained with specifics rather than glossed over.

Employee benefits rank 7th of 7 in 2025.

Madison ranks 2nd of 7 in this broader admin bucket.

Total administration ranks 5th of 7 overall, which is why the sub-accounts matter here.

Transportation is a high-ranking operations category at 2nd of 7 and deserves explanation, not applause.

Security ranks 5th of 7 and uses a 2022-2025 per-pupil trend.

Facility maintenance ranks 2nd of 7 in 2025.

Custodial services places Madison 5th of 7.

Madison ranks 1st of 7 in this operations category, which should prompt questions about what is driving that cost.