This page is meant to give residents a cleaner apples-to-apples view of how Summit compares with the six other districts on our ACFR dashboard. The rankings below are based on verified 2025 per-pupil figures unless otherwise noted. A rank of 1st means the highest per-student spending in that category among the seven-district peer group.
Summit sits in the lower tier overall on total per-pupil cost, but not because every category is low. The district combines a handful of top-ranked line items with a number of bottom-tier categories, which creates a much more uneven spending profile than the top-line total suggests.
This section shows how Summit compares on classroom instruction and related instructional support categories.
Summit is not near the top in overall instruction, but it does rank 1st of 7 in textbooks and 2nd of 7 in improvement of instruction. That suggests targeted instructional support spending even while total instruction and staff training rank lower. Those higher ranks are not self-justifying. They are categories residents should ask the district to explain.
Summit’s special education profile is mixed, with a few middle-tier categories but several lines near the bottom of the peer group.
Summit sits in the middle on total special education, resource room, and learning/language disabilities, but ranks 7th of 7 in child study teams, speech/OT/PT, and other school placement. This is not an across-the-board special education profile. It is a split one, and the differences between those lines deserve explanation.
These categories reflect counseling, student activities, health services, library/media, bilingual support, and remedial services.
Summit ranks 1st of 7 in both educational media services and bilingual education, but 7th of 7 in guidance and 6th of 7 in cocurricular activities. This section shows one of the clearest examples of Summit’s uneven profile. The higher-ranked categories should be questioned the same way lower-ranked ones are, not treated as automatic wins.
Summit’s administrative profile includes one top-ranked category but several others in the lower tier. That makes this a place where residents should ask what is actually sitting inside the accounts, not just look at labels.
Summit ranks 1st of 7 in central services, but 7th of 7 in admin information tech and 6th of 7 in both gen admin (misc) and the gen admin total sub-account. Total administration itself ranks 6th of 7. That means central services should not be read as a quiet positive. It is a line item the district should be able to explain specifically.
These are the costs of running the district day to day: transportation, security, facility maintenance, custodial services, and grounds. Lower rankings here are not automatically good or bad. They still need context.
Summit ranks 3rd of 7 in custodial services, but transportation and security both rank 7th of 7. Facility maintenance and grounds are also in the lower half of the group. This section, like others on the page, looks uneven rather than consistently high or consistently low.
These charts show not just where Summit ranks in 2025, but how spending has moved over time relative to the seven-district average.

Summit ranks 6th of 7 overall on total per-pupil cost.

Total instruction ranks 5th of 7 in 2025.

Regular classroom instruction ranks 4th of 7.

Staff training lands 6th of 7.

Textbook spending ranks 1st of 7. That should be explained in context, not treated as a built-in positive.

This category ranks 2nd of 7.

Total special education ranks 4th of 7.

Resource room spending ranks 3rd of 7.

Out-of-district placement ranks 7th of 7.

Child study teams rank 7th of 7.

Autism services rank 5th of 7.

Speech-related services rank 7th of 7.

This category ranks 3rd of 7.

This category ranks 6th of 7.

Cocurricular activities rank 6th of 7.

Athletics ranks 5th of 7 among peers.

Guidance spending ranks 7th of 7.

Health services rank 5th of 7.

Library/media spending ranks 1st of 7, another category that should be read as a cost choice to explain.

Basic skills/remedial ranks 4th of 7.

Bilingual education ranks 1st of 7 and should be evaluated in light of actual student need and program design.

This line item ranks 6th of 7.

School administration ranks 4th of 7.

Central services rank 1st of 7, which should prompt questions about what is being coded there and why.

Administrative information technology ranks 7th of 7.

Legal fees rank 3rd of 7.

Employee benefits rank 4th of 7.

This broader admin bucket ranks 6th of 7.

Total administration ranks 6th of 7 overall.

Transportation ranks 7th of 7.

Security ranks 7th of 7 and uses a 2022-2025 per-pupil trend.

Facility maintenance ranks 5th of 7.

Custodial services rank 3rd of 7.

Grounds spending ranks 5th of 7.